Lysenko = Bush
In case you've been under the blog-rock lately, science blogs are aflutter about this.
The creationists start to harras the physicists and demand that the big bang be explicitly noted as a theory that doesn't presume that intelligent design can't be involved.
In case my position has been at all unclear in this blog - religios freaks; GO F**K YOURSELVES
Please read other blogs for more apologetic and articulate responses (that boil down to the same thing anyway).
Is it possible for chemistry to creationised?
The creationists start to harras the physicists and demand that the big bang be explicitly noted as a theory that doesn't presume that intelligent design can't be involved.
In case my position has been at all unclear in this blog - religios freaks; GO F**K YOURSELVES
Please read other blogs for more apologetic and articulate responses (that boil down to the same thing anyway).
Is it possible for chemistry to creationised?
- No unpaired spin states - god doesn't allow unwedded electrons in the same orbitals
- god would know if Schrodinger's cat was alive
- no box could hold god's electrons
- 'god may have made the world, but the devil lives on surfaces' - Fermi adopted as literal truth
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home